国际投资仲裁中最惠国条款的适用和管辖权的新发展  

The Application of MFN Clauses and the New Trends of Jurisdiction in International Investment Arbitration

作　　者：黄世席[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2013年第2期177-185,共9页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(10JJD820004)"中国国家豁免立法问题研究"

摘　　要：国际投资仲裁中某一投资条约规定的最惠国条款能否延伸适用于其他投资条约规定的仲裁程序是近年来的一个热门话题,仲裁裁决的实践给出了两种完全不同的答案,并且依据《维也纳条约法公约》对有关条款进行解释几乎是所有仲裁庭必做的工作。但是近两年的裁决似乎有一种将最惠国条款扩大适用于仲裁程序的趋势,尽管不同仲裁庭甚至同一仲裁庭的不同仲裁员对于同一问题可能会有不同的观点。我国签订的投资条约应当明确最惠国条款和仲裁程序的适用范围,以及规定条约不溯及既往原则等。Whether the MFN clauses in one international investment treaty can be applied to other investment treaties＂ arbitral procedure provisions has been a controversial topic in recent years. The jurisprudence of international investment ar- bitral awards has provided two different answers, and almost all the arbitration tribunals interpreted the MFN clauses ac- cording to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. However, there existed an increasing trend that applying MFN clauses to arbitral procedure, although different tribunals and even different arbitrators within one tribunal may have differ- ent opinion about this trend. The investment treaties signed by China should also define the scope of the MFN clauses and arbitral procedure provisions, and incorporate the principle of non - retroactivity of treaties.

关 键 词：国际投资仲裁 最惠国条款 仲裁管辖权 条约解释 

分 类 号：DF964[政治法律—国际法学]