牵引辅助下充气复位器复位联合康复训练治疗稳定型胸腰椎压缩性骨折的疗效观察  

Clinical efficacy of pneumatic reductor assisted with traction and rehabilitation training treatment of stable thoracolumbar compression fracture

作　　者：丁璟琳[1] 龙亨国[2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江省舟山市中医骨伤联合医院康复科,浙江舟山316000 [2]浙江省舟山市中医骨伤联合医院脊柱科,浙江舟山316000

出　　处：《中国现代医生》2013年第9期46-47,49,共3页China Modern Doctor

基　　金：浙江省中医药科技计划基金资助项目(2009CB081)

摘　　要：目的探讨牵引下行充气复位器复位联合康复训练治疗稳定型胸腰椎压缩性骨折的疗效。方法将210例患者分为观察组与对照组,各105例。对照组予以垫枕治疗,观察组在牵引下行充气复位器复位联合康复训练,比较两组的疗效。结果复位后3个月,观察组与对照组治愈率为93.33%、81.90%。各组复位后与复位前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);复位后即刻,观察组与对照组前缘压缩率、Cobb角、椎管内占位比比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论牵引辅助下充气复位器复位联合康复训练治疗稳定型胸腰椎压缩性骨折具有较好的临床疗效和效率。Objective To explore curative efficiency and efficacy on stable thoracolumbar compression fracture＇s treatment by pneumatic redactor assisted with traction and rehabilitation training. Methods All 210 cases were divided into observation group and control group, 105 cases in per group. Patients in control group were treated by drug pillow, and patients in observation group were treated by pneumatic redactor assisted with traction and rehabilitation training. Curative efficiency and efficacy were compared. Results The cure rate of observation group and control group was 93.33% and 81.90%. There was statistical difference on clinical indicators of reset immediately and 3 months later after reset comparing with before reset （P 〈 0.05）. There was statistical difference on anterior vertebral compression rate, Cobb angle, intraspinal occupying ratio on reset immediately between two groups（P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0.01）. Conclusion It has better clinical efficacy and efficiency of treating stable thoracolumbar compression fracture by pneumatic redactor assisted with traction and rehabilitation training.

关 键 词：胸腰椎压缩性骨折 牵引 充气复位 康复训练 保守治疗 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]