离子选择电极法和新氟试剂光度法测定空气中HF的比较  被引量:2

Comparation of Determination of HF in Ambient Air Between Fluorine Ion-selective Electrode Analysis Method and Fluor Reagent Spectrophotometry

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:吴晋霞[1] 李杰[1] 周益民[1] 王绍俊[1] 

机构地区:[1]新疆生产建设兵团环境监测中心站,乌鲁木齐830011

出  处:《化学分析计量》2013年第2期16-19,共4页Chemical Analysis And Meterage

基  金:国家标准制修订项目(127)

摘  要:对离子选择电极法与新氟试剂光度法的特性指标进行了比对研究。结果表明,离子选择电极法检出限为0.01 mg/L,线性范围为0.04~1 900 mg/L,相对标准偏差为0.16%~0.30%,加标回收率为101%;新氟试剂光度法检出限为0.05 mg/L,线性范围为0.06~1.5 mg/L,相对标准偏差为1.05%~2.10%,加标回收率为105%。两种方法结果无显著性差异,但离子选择电极法与新氟试剂光度法相比,测定下限低,测定范围宽,精密度、准确度较高,因此选定离子选择电极法作为制定大气中氟化氢测定法国家标准的基础。The comparative research of characteristic factors between fluorine ion-selective electrode analysis method and fluor reagent spectrophotometry was made, The results showed that for fuorine ion-selective electrode analysis method: the detection limit was 0.01 rag/L, the linear range was 0.04-1 900 mg/L, the relative standard deviation was 0.16%-0.30% and the recovery was 101%; for fluor reagent spectrophotometry: the detection limit was 0.05 mg / L, the linear range was 0.06-1.5 mg/L, the relative standard deviation was 1.05%-2.10% and the recovery was 105%. There was no defference between these methods detection results, but compared with fluor reagent spectrophotometry, fluorine ion-selective electrode analysis method had lower quantitative detection limit, fine precision and accuracy, and larger determination range. Fluorine ion-selective electrode determine the hydrogen fluoride in ambient air. analysis method was selected to be the base of nation standard to

关 键 词:氟离子选择电极 新氟试剂 光度法 大气氟化物 比较 

分 类 号:O657.15[理学—分析化学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象