检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《解放军医院管理杂志》2013年第1期88-90,98,共4页Hospital Administration Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
基 金:湖北省鄂州市2010年科技项目;2011年鄂州市中心医院科技重点项目
摘 要:目的构建临床Ⅰ类技术准入及奖励评估体系。方法文献分析,设计临床Ⅰ类技术准入及奖励评估指标,应用改进Delphi法进行两轮专家问卷咨询和应用,确定评估指标的内容和权重。结果两轮专家积极系数为100%,专家对Ⅰ类技术准入评估总体平均权威程度为0.870,两轮专家协调程度为0.113、0.139;奖励评估总体平均权威程度为0.889,协调程度为0.581、0.603,经Kendall's W检验,P=0.001;建立了规范、量化的临床Ⅰ类技术准入及奖励评估体系。结论体系的建立为临床Ⅰ类技术应用提供了科学依据,有助于规范Ⅰ类技术的管理。Objective To establish the criterion and award evaluation system of class I clinical technique.Methods Based on literature review,a primary admittance and award assessment index of class I clinical technique was put forward,and carried on two round of expert consultations with modified Delphi method and then applied in hospital to set up a scientific assessment system.Results The enthusiasm coefficient of specialists in two round consultations is 100%,the degree of specialists authority of admittance assessment system are 0.870,the coordination coefficient of the specialists'opinion are 0.113 and 0.139 respectively;The degree of specialists authority of award assessment system was 0.889,the coordination coefficient of the specialists opinion was 0.581 and 0.603 respectively.Tested with Kendall W,the result is highly statistically significant(P=0.001).Ten indicators which contain three grades of criteria in assessment system were established.Conclusions Evaluation System of Class I clinical technique provided scientific evidences and normalized management for clinical technique.
关 键 词:临床Ⅰ类技术 准入 奖励 评估体系 改进Delphi法
分 类 号:R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117