检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金圣仁[1]
出 处:《中国医药科学》2013年第4期76-77,共2页China Medicine And Pharmacy
摘 要:目的对应用泵注给药和常规皮下注射两种方式对糖尿病患者实施治疗的临床效果进行对比。方法抽取92例患有糖尿病的患者,将其分为常规组和试验组,每组46例。采用常规皮下注射胰岛素方式对常规组患者实施治疗;采用泵注胰岛素方式对试验组患者实施治疗。结果试验组患者糖尿病症状治疗效果明显优于常规组;血糖控制时间和血酮体转阴时间明显短于常规组;空腹血糖和餐后2h血糖水平明显低于常规组;出现用药不良反应的人数明显少于常规组。结论应用泵注胰岛素方式对糖尿病患者实施治疗的临床效果非常明显。Objective To investigate the clinical effect of the pump injection and conventional subcutaneous injection in treatment of patients with diabetes. Methods 92 cases of patients with diabetes were divided into conventional group and test group,with 46 cases in each group.Conventional group was given conventional subcutaneous insulin injection treatment;test group was given insulin pump injection treatment. Results The diabetes treatment effect of test group was significantly better than the conventional group;glycemic control time and blood ketone shade time was significantly shorter than the conventional group;fasting plasma glucose and 2 h postprandial blood glucose level was significantly lower than the conventional group;the number of patients with adverse reaction was significantly less than the conventional group. Conclusion The clinical effect of pump insulin in patients with diabetes is very obvious.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.56