检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟成磊[1,2]
机构地区:[1]一汽总医院 [2]吉林大学第四医院,吉林长春130011
出 处:《中国医药科学》2013年第4期156-157,共2页China Medicine And Pharmacy
摘 要:目的观察椎板开窗潜行减压治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法笔者所在医院2010年10月~2012年10月共收治了腰椎间盘突出症患者140例,将其作为本组研究的研究对象并进行相应的分组处理,即对照组:70例腰椎间盘突出症患者运用传统的方式来进行治疗;观察组:70例腰椎间盘突出症患者运用锥板开窗潜行减压的方式进行治疗,对比两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果观察组患者治疗后的优良率为88.57%,相比于对照组患者的75.71%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于腰椎间盘突出症的患者而言,在保守治疗无效的情况下则应该在正确的手术时机下进行手术治疗,锥板开窗潜行减压治疗十分的安全和有效,值得推广。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of lamina fenestration sneak decompression for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Methods 140 cases of patients with lumbar disc herniation in our hospital from October 2011 to October 2012 were selected and divided into two groups,70 cases of control group were given traditional treatment.70 cases of observation group were given cone plate windows sneak decompression treatment,clinical outcomes of two groups were compared. Results Excellent rate of observation group was 88.57%,compared to control group(75.71%),the difference was significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion In the case of invalid conservative therapy,patients with lumbar disc herniation should be given timing surgical treatment, cone and plate windows sneak decompression therapy is very safe and effective, should be promoted.
关 键 词:锥板开窗潜行减压治疗 椎间盘突出 临床疗效
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46