检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省三台县人民医院重症医学科,四川三台621100
出 处:《中国医药科学》2013年第4期168-169,共2页China Medicine And Pharmacy
摘 要:目的探讨丙泊酚在高血压性脑出血患者术后的作用。方法将150例高血压性脑出血术后患者分为丙泊酚组和咪唑安定组,除镇静药物不同外其余治疗方法均相同,观察二者的镇静效果及再出血风险和癫痫的发生率。结果 2组在降低再出血及癫痫的发生率方面比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在镇静效果方面二者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论丙泊酚在降低再出血风险及癫痫的发生率方面优于咪唑安定,但二者在镇静效果方面没有差异。Objective To explore the effect of propofol in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage postoperative sedation. Methods 150 hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage sufferers were randomly divided into propofol group and midazolam group.Two groups effect in conscious-sedation and rehaemorrhagia risk and epilepsy incidence were observed. Results Propofol group was significantly lower in rehaemorrhagia risk and epilepsy incidence than midazolam group(P 〈 0.05),there were no statistical significant difference between propofol group and midazolam group in conscious-sedation effectiveness(P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Propofol could cut down rehaemorrhagia risk and epilepsy incidence surpass to midazolam.But two group have the same conscious-sedation effectiveness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117