检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘晓琳[1,2] 路方红[1] 刘振东[1] 赵颖馨[1] 胡小亮[1,2]
机构地区:[1]山东省医学科学院基础医学研究所心脑血管病防治研究中心,济南山东250062 [2]济南大学山东省医学科学院医学与生命科学院,济南山东250022
出 处:《心脏杂志》2013年第1期66-69,共4页Chinese Heart Journal
基 金:山东省科技发展计划项目资助(2011GSF11822);山东省自然科学基金项目资助(ZR2009CL029;ZR2011HQ053)
摘 要:目的:探讨治疗性生活方式干预对轻中度高血压病患者动态血压参数的影响。方法:收集246例轻中度高血压病患者,随机分为治疗性生活方式干预组(干预组)130例和对照组116例。在降压药物治疗的基础上,干预组进行严格的饮食、锻炼等生活方式干预,对照组进行常规生活方式干预。所有受试者干预前后进行动态血压检测。结果:干预1年后,干预组24 h、夜间(n)平均血压及白昼(d)收缩压(SBP)下降幅度均显著高于对照组[分别为24hSBP(22±6)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)vs.(15±5)mmHg、nSBP(26±14)mmHg vs.(17±10)mmHg、24hDBP(10±7)mmHg vs.(8±5)mmHg、nDBP(11±7)mmHg vs.(9±6)mmHg和dSBP(20±8)mmHg vs.(14±7)mmHg,均P<0.05];白昼、夜间的收缩压负荷值下降幅度干预组显著高于对照组[分别为(30±14)mmHg vs.(25±14)mmHg和(43±24)mmHg vs.(31±18)mmHg,均P<0.05];血压杓型转归率及血压达标率干预组均显著高于对照组(26%vs.10%和85%vs.63%,均P<0.01)。结论:治疗性生活方式干预显著降低了24 h(尤其是夜间)血压均值及收缩压负荷,有助于恢复患者的血压昼夜节律。AIM: To investigate the effect of therapeutic lifestyle intervention on the ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Two hundred and fortysix hypertensive patients were randomly divided into two groups : therapeutic lifestyle intervention group ( n = 130) with mandatory lifes tyle intervention (lowsalt dietary and exercise) and control group (n116) with routine lifestyle inter vention. All subjects were given antihypertensive agents and 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed in all subjects before and after the intervention. RESULTS: After lyear treat ment, decreased levels of 24h, nighttime blood pressure and daytime systolic blood pressure in interven tion group were significantly higher than those in control group [ 24 h SBP (22 ±6) mmHg (1 mmHg = 0. 133 kPa) vs. (15±5) mmHg, nSBP (26±14) mmHg vs. (17±10) mmHg, 24 h DBP (10±7) mmHg vs. (8±5) mmHg, nDBP (11 ±7) mmHg vs. (9 ±6) mmHg, dSBP (20 ±8) mmHg vs. ( 14 ± 7) mmHg, all P 〈 0. 05 ]. The decreased levels of daytime and nighttime SBP load (dSBP load and nSBP load) in intervention group were also significantly higher than those in control group [ (30 ± 14 )mmHg vs. (25 ± 14) mmHg (43 ±24) mmHg vs. (31 ± 18) mmHg, all P 〈0. 051. The outcome rate of dipper blood pressure and compliance rate of blood pressure in intervention group were significantly higher than those in control group (26% vs. 10% and 85% vs. 63% , all P 〈0. 01 ). CONCLUSION: Thera peutic lifestyle interventions significantly lower the average blood pressure, especially the night blood pressure and systolic blood pressure load in patients with essential hypertension. Therapeutic lifestyle interventions may have some beneficial effects on the restoration of circadian rhythm.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38