检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学公共卫生学院,北京100191 [2]北京大学第一医院,北京100034
出 处:《中国健康教育》2013年第2期116-119,共4页Chinese Journal of Health Education
摘 要:目的探讨抑郁症病耻感量表(DSS)中文版在北京市15~24岁人群的适用性及效度和信度检验。方法由课题组专家对原量表进行翻译、审校和回译,确定DSS中文版符合量表原意。采用方便抽样抽取北京市某中学、两所综合大学学生和工作人员共830名15~24岁人群施测,分析了DSS的得分情况、效度、信度和区分度。结果调查对象个人DSS得分(17.43±3.86)低于感知DSS得分(19.48±4.18)(P<0.05);结构效度分析中,个人DSS提取了4个因子,其累积方差贡献率为60.29%;感知DSS提取了3个因子,其累积方差贡献率为56.6%;个人、感知及总DSS的Cronbach’sα系数分别为0.45、0.67和0.70;区分度良好。结论 DSS的效度和信度适中,区分度较好,可用于中国15~24岁人群抑郁症病耻感方面的研究。Objective To evaluate the application of depression stigma scale on young people in China and exam ine its validity and reliability. Methods 830 students and staffs aged 15 to 24 from one middle school and two universities completed Depression Stigma Scale (DSS). Validity, reliability, discrimination of the scale was analyzed. Results Per sonal depression stigma of the subjects was significantly lower than perceived depression stigma ( P 〈 0. 05 ) , with the scores of ( 17.43 ±3.86) and ( 19. 48± 4. 18 ), respectively. Structural validity analysis showed that four factors were extracted from personal depression stigma with the contribution of 60. 29%, three from perceived depression stigma with the contribu tion of 56. 6%. Cronbaeh' s coefficient of personal, perceived and total depression stigma scales were 0.45, 0. 67 and 0. 70, and the scale was of good discrimination. Conelusion The depression stigma scale was of moderate validity and, re liability and of good discrimination. It can be used in the studies on young people' s stigma against depression in China.
分 类 号:R193[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] R749.4[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117