检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:满玉清[1] 崔光怀[2] 宋征[1] 张循格[1] 石效荣[1] 刘焕[1]
机构地区:[1]滨州医学院附属医院药学部,滨州256603 [2]滨州医学院附属医院烧伤整形外科
出 处:《滨州医学院学报》2013年第1期19-20,共2页Journal of Binzhou Medical University
摘 要:目的观察复方三黄氯酊治疗严重褥疮的临床疗效。方法将Ⅲ度、Ⅳ度褥疮患者随机分为3组,A:复方三黄氯酊治疗组;B:红霉素软膏治疗组;C:湿润烧伤膏治疗组。通过比较创面感染控制天数及创面愈合天数观察治疗褥疮的效果。结果复方三黄氯酊治疗组较红霉素软膏治疗组、湿润烧伤膏治疗组能显著缩短创面感染控制天数及创面愈合天数(P<0.05)。结论复方三黄氯酊治疗严重褥疮较红霉素软膏、湿润烧伤膏具明显优势,值得推广使用。Objective To observe the efficacy of compound sanhuang chloramphenicol tincture in treating serious bedsore. Methods The patients got Ⅲ and Ⅳ degree bedsore were divided into 3 groups randomly. Patients in group A were treated with com- pound sanhuang chloramphenicol tincture;patients in group B were treated with erythromycin ointment;patients in group C were treated with MEBO. The clinical efficiency was observed by comparing the time of control infection and wound healing days. Results Compa- ring to the group B and C, the group A could remarkable decrease the time of control infection and the wound healing days ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The clinical efficiency of compound sanhuang chloramphenicol tincture was obviously stronger than erythromycin ointment and MEBO, it is worth to be popularized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.203.108