检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东医学院附属医院(广东医学院护理学院) [2]广东医学院附属医院
出 处:《全科护理》2013年第8期681-684,共4页Chinese General Practice Nursing
基 金:广东省湛江市科技攻关计划项目;编号:2011C3102002
摘 要:[目的]观察舒适护理在骨牵引病人中的应用效果。[方法]将100例行骨牵引的病人随机分为实验组和对照组,对照组给予常规护理,实验组在常规护理的基础上给予舒适护理,观察比较两组病人疼痛程度、住院满意率、焦虑、抑郁、应对方式、治疗依从性、住院时间、并发症等情况。[结果]护理后实验组Ⅰ级疼痛发生率、住院满意率、应对方式得分中的面对得分均高于对照组(P<0.05);焦虑自评量表(SAS)与抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、并发症发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05);治疗依从性优于对照组、住院时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。[结论]对骨牵引病人实施舒适护理可以降低病人不适、提高病人治疗依从性、减少并发症、缩短住院时间、提高病人满意率。Objective: To observe the applied effect of comfort care for pa- tients receiving skeletal traction. Methods:A total of 100 cases of patients receiving skeletal traction were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, the control group patients received conventional care, the experimental group patients were given comfort care on the basis of the usual care, then to observe and compare the degree of pain, inpatient satis- faction rate, anxiety, depression, coping style, treatment compliance, dura- tion of hospitalization, and complications of patients between two groups. Results : After care, the experimental group, the incidence of level I pain, in- patient satisfaction rate, the face score of coping style score were higher than that of control group (P〈0.05);SAS and SDS scores, incidence of complications were lower than that of control group (P〈0.05);treatment compliance was better than that of control group, hospital stay was shorter than that of control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion:implementation of com- fort care can reduce the patients~ discomfort, and improve patients ' treat- ment compliance, reduce complications, shorten hospital stays and enhance the satisfaction rate of patients with skeletal tractidn.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249