生态学方法在控制城镇居民区家鼠中的作用  

The Effect of Rodent Control with Ecological Measures in the Residential Quarters of the Urban Area

作　　者：王谷生 岳木生 刘起勇[2] 李镜辉[2] 李键 何全胜 张震中 

机构地区：[1]湖北省卫生防疫站,武汉430079 [2]中国预防医学科学院流行病学微生物学研究所 [3]湖北省爱卫会办公室 [4]潜江市卫生防疫站

出　　处：《中国媒介生物学及控制杂志》2000年第5期326-327,共2页Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control

摘　　要：目的 :继天门城镇居民区采用生态学方法防制家鼠试验后 ,又在潜江按同一方法进行试验 ,探讨该方法在家鼠防制中的作用及可行性。方法 :比较以生态学方法为主的综合防制与单一药物防制家鼠的效果。结果 :试验区鼠密度从 1997年 6月起一直维持在国家标准 3%以下 ,两年间鼠密度在 1%以下的有 14个月 ;药物区每年组织两次灭鼠 ,鼠密度呈高低波动 ,两年中仅有8个月在 3%以下 ;空白区两年间有 2个月高出试验前鼠密度 ( 7.2 5% ) ,绝大多数月份在 4 %～ 6%之间。结论 :以生态学方法为主的综合防制比单一药物防制家鼠可取得更好、更持久的灭鼠效果。Objective: Effect and feasibility of rodent control have studied continully in Qianjiang after Tianmen with the method of integrated commensal rodent management with ecological measures playing a leading role in the residential quarters of the urban area. Method: To compare the effect of the two method integrated commensal rodent management with ecological measures playing a leading role and rodenticides only against commensal rodents. Result: The rodent density in the test area was controled under 3% of the country standard since June 1997. The rodent density under 1% was lasting for 14 months during the two years. The rodent density in rodenticide control area was under 3% of the country standard for only eight months. The rodent density of two months in control area was higher than that in the test areas during the two years. The rodent density of most months was 4%-6%. Conclusion: The effect of integrated commensal rodent management with ecological measures playing a leading role is better than that of only rodenticide against commensal rodents.

关 键 词：城镇居民区 家鼠 生态学方法 综合防治 

分 类 号：R184.35[医药卫生—流行病学]