陆九渊《荆国王文公祠堂记》与朱陆学术之争  

Disputes between LU Jiuyuan's Jin Guo Wang Wen Gong Ci Tang Ji and ZHU Lu's Theory

作　　者：周建刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南省社会科学院哲学研究所,湖南长沙410003

出　　处：《江西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第1期54-58,共5页Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"周敦颐与宋明理学思想谱系研究"(编号:11BZX048)

摘　　要：陆九渊晚年所作的《荆国王文公祠堂记》,评述了北宋的熙宁变法以及王安石的学术失误之处。此文高度肯定王安石的人品操守和政治理想,但指出王安石拘泥于外在法度的做法是不明政治之本原,重末而轻本,从而导致了熙宁变法的失败。陆九渊关于王安石学术的评论与朱熹不同,这一差异反映出朱陆二人在学术思想上的根本分歧,由此也构成了朱陆之争的重要环节。《荆国王文公祠堂记》中所反映的"心学政治观",代表了陆九渊晚年思想的成熟境界。LU Jiuyuan＇s Jin Guo Wang Wen Gong Ci Tang Ji commented and expounded Xining Reform of the Northern Song Dynasty and WANG Anshi＇s academic failures.The paper confirms WANG Anshi＇s personal integrity and political ideals,but points out that the practice which WANG Anshi rigidly adhered to external laws shows that he did not understand the political principles,and focused on small and despised fundamentals,which led to the failure of Xining Reform.LU Jiuyuan＇s comments about WANG Anshi＇s academic theory was different from ZHU Xi＇s,and the differences reflects ZHU and LU＇s fundamental differences in the academic ideology,which also constitutes an important link of the dispute between ZHU and LU.＂the political view of the philosophy of the mind＂ reflected in Jin Guo Wang Wen Gong Ci Tang Ji represents the maturity of LU Jiuyuan＇s thought in his later years.

关 键 词：荆国王文公祠堂记 王安石 心学政治观 朱陆之争 

分 类 号：R244.8[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]