对司法能力的实践性反思——基于法释[2009]9号的刑法哲学解读  

The Practical Reflections on the Judicial Capacity: Based on the Penal Philosophy Illumination of the New Judicial Interpretation

作　　者：聂长建[1] 张宇 

机构地区：[1]中南民族大学法学院 [2]河南省光山县人民法院

出　　处：《理论与现代化》2013年第2期117-121,共5页Theory and Modernization

基　　金：中南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"疑难案件的司法技艺研究"成果之一;项目编号:CSY12003

摘　　要：法释[2009]9号,对"明星若知假仍代言广告"的行为作出了"作为共犯处理"的"明确规定",但我国刑法已对这个问题有了"明文规定"。把"明文规定"误解为"明确规定"不仅在理论上站不住脚,也在实践上阻止了司法机关对危害性行为的及时处罚。这种误解是我国当下司法能力不足的表现,提高司法能力有赖于建设一支高素质的司法队伍。Abstract： The new judicial interpretation ＂explicitly stipulated＂ that ＂if the star still endorse the advertisement after knowing it＇s false＂, he will ＂be regarded as an accomplice＂, but Criminal Law had ＂expressly stipulated in writing＂ on this issue. Misconstruing ＂expressly stipulated in writing＂ as ＂explicitly stipulated＂ not only is untenable in theory, but also will prevent judicial authority from timely penalizing for harmful acts in practice. This kind of misunderstanding manifests China lacks of judicial capacity in the contemporary era. Improving judicial capacity depends on a high-quality judicial contingent.

关 键 词：明文规定 明确规定 司法能力 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]