对双宾语结构合法性的思考  

Querying the Validity of the Double Object Construction

作　　者：赵春生[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆交通大学外国语学院,重庆400074

出　　处：《重庆工商大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第2期138-142,共5页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：为了避免或减少由双宾语结构引起的理论冗余和导致的教学尴尬,本文重审双宾语结构研究中的两大焦点问题——格问题与主目结构问题,发现:双宾语结构中的直宾与间宾不能都获得宾格,从而无法成为合法的动词宾语。因此,双宾语结构不具有句法学意义上的合法性,而只存于语言表象。这一推论得到了语言事实的印证。In order to reduce or avoid the redundancy in theoretical researches and the awkwardness in language teaching brought about by the double-object construction （DOC） , this paper reexamines the case assignment and the argument structure in the DOC, and finds out the following facts ： the indirect object and the direct object can not be both assigned .accusative case ; the DOC, in which one predicate verb takes two internal arguments as its objects, goes against the binary structure, the holographic law of language and the universe. Based on those facts, an inference, verified by the real linguistic data, can be made that the DOC is representational and makes no sense in terms of syntactic existence.

关 键 词：双宾语结构 宾格 二分结构 合法性 

分 类 号：H14[语言文字—汉语]