检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:羊平 王艺何 李春满[3] 朱磊[3] 董丽英[3]
机构地区:[1]云南省安宁市禄脿医院,云南安宁650311 [2]云南省玉溪市矿业医院 [3]昆明医科大学第二附属医院
出 处:《中国医学创新》2013年第9期26-28,共3页Medical Innovation of China
摘 要:目的:探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床价值及优越性。方法:对比、观察开腹阑尾切除术(对照组46例)与腹腔镜阑尾切除术(观察组96例)的手术及并发症情况。结果:两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术中出血量、术后排气时间、抗生素使用时间及平均住院时间均明显低于对照组(P<0.01);观察组患者术后并发症的发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少、操作简单等优点,可作为目前治疗急性阑尾炎的一种较佳微创手术方案,值得临床推广应用。@@@@Objective:To investigate the clinical value and superiority of laparoscopic appendectomy surgery for acute appendicitis. Method:The surgery and complications of open appendectomy(control group,46 cases)and laparoscopic appendectomy surgery(observation group,96 cases)were observed by groups comparison method. Result:The operation time of the two groups showed no significant difference(P>0.05);blood loss,postoperative exhaust time,antibiotic use time,and the average hospital stay of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group(P<0.01);incidence of postoperative complications of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion:For acute appendicitis,laparoscopic appendectomy surgery has less trauma,quicker recovery,fewer complications,and simple operation,which can be a preferred minimally invasive surgery program for the treatment of acute appendicitis and is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38