固体纤维素类废物作为反硝化碳源滤料的比选  

Comparison and Optimization of Cellulose Carbon Source for Denitrification Filter

作　　者：李斌[1] 郝瑞霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京工业大学建筑工程学院,北京市水质科学与水环境恢复工程重点实验室,北京100124

出　　处：《环境科学》2013年第4期1428-1434,共7页Environmental Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(51178005)

摘　　要：以棉花、稻草、稻壳、玉米芯这4种农业废弃物作为反硝化碳源和微生物载体,通过对静态释碳数量和质量、长期脱氮效果以及生物附着性能等方面的比较,旨在优选出适于再生水反硝化深度脱氮生物滤池的固体纤维素碳源滤料.结果表明,玉米芯初期可溶性有机物较多,易于微生物的附着和繁殖生长;且比其它3种碳源表现出更好的长期反硝化效果,2.5 g玉米芯在46 d累计去除了284.544 g的硝氮;棉花、稻草前期处理效果较好,但长期反硝化能力不如玉米芯;稻壳的处理效果最差,几乎不能被微生物有效利用.因此,玉米芯更适用于再生水反硝化深度脱氮滤池的碳源滤料.The quantity and quality of carbon released by four agriculture wastes included of cotton,rice hull,rice straw and corncob was analyzed for selecting a suitable cellulose filter medium as well as the carbon source in advanced denitrification of the reclaimed water.And the long-term denitrification efficiency and bio-attachment capability of four agriculture wastes was contrastively estimated by running denitrification experiments in laboratory scale.The results showed that DOM amount released by corncob was the highest at the beginning,and the DOM quality was also beneficial for microorganism growth and biofilm formation.The running denitrification experiments showed that corncob had better denitrification efficiency than that of other three carbon sources,and 284.544 g nitrate was removed by 2.5 g corncob within 46 days.Cotton and rice hull had better denitrification efficiency than corncob in the early time,but the long-term denitrification efficiency was lower than that of corncob.Rice straw can hardly be used by microorganism so as to have the lowest denitrification.Therefore,corncob was more suitable to be the denitrification biofilter filter medium and the carbon source in advanced denitrification of the reclaimed water.

关 键 词：反硝化 碳源 农业废弃物 生物滤池滤料 玉米芯 

分 类 号：X705[环境科学与工程—环境工程]