检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国民航飞行学院航空运输管理学院,广汉618307
出 处:《系统工程理论与实践》2013年第4期963-970,共8页Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基 金:国家自然科学基金(61179074;60776820)
摘 要:为了解决传统机队规划方法无法反映机队运营鲁棒性的缺陷,针对单基地线性航线结构运营模式特点,以基地机场配置机型数最小为目标函数,考虑"航班节"机型分配成本限制,"航班节"机型分配唯一性限制,所选机型最少飞机数限制等条件构建机队的鲁棒性规划模型,并结合唯一竞争机型限制为模型设计启发式算法."39个航班节,6种候选机型"的案例分析表明:传统机队规划法所得出的机队构成中有3种机型,而由机队的鲁棒性规划法所得出的机队构成中机型数仅为2种,且机队构成能够很好的适应市场需求的波动,因此算法可行.Traditional airline fleet planning methods could not reflect the robustness of fleet composition. In order to solve this shortcoming for airlines which operated in single-base linear route structure operating mode, this paper regarded minimum aircraft types deployed on single-base airport as objective, with flight pairing fleet assignment cost constraint, flight pairing fleet assignment uniqueness constraint, and least numbers of selected aircraft types constraint, to incorporate robustness into airline fleet planning model. Combining with only one competitive aircraft type in a desired fleet composition, the simulated annealing algorithm was employed to design heuristic algorithm for this proposed model. An empirical example containing 39 flight parings and 6 candidate aircraft types indicates that the fleet composition derived from traditional fleet planning method has three aircraft types while the proposed algorithm has only two. Furthermore, the fleet composition can well adapt to the market fluctuations, so the algorithm is feasible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249