检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国药房》2013年第15期1414-1417,共4页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:系统评价中西医结合方案治疗脓毒症的临床疗效和安全性。方法:查找Cochrane图书馆系统评价资料库、Cochrane协作网对照试验中心注册数据库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、中国知网和万方数据库,全面收集中西医结合方案治疗脓毒症患者的随机对照试验(RCT),使用Revman5.0软件进行Meta分析。结果:本研究纳入文献14篇,共967例患者。中西医结合方案治疗脓毒症的住院病死率[OR=0.41,95%CI(0.26,0.65),P<0.01]、有效率[OR=2.52,95%CI(1.40,4.54),P<0.01]、急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)评分[OR=-3.70,95%CI(-6.13,-1.28),P<0.01]、中医辨证评分[MD=-2.03,95%CI(-3.00,-1.06),P<0.01]均优于对照组。结论:中西医结合方案治疗脓毒症有一定的临床疗效。由于纳入的研究数量有限,该系统评价的结果需谨慎对待,尚需更多的设计合理、多中心、大样本的RCT进一步证实。OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of integrated Chinese and western medicine scheme in the treatment of sepsis systematically. METHODS: Retrieved from Cochrane library, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang database, RCTs about integrated Chinese and western medicine scheme for sepsis patients were collected completely. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevmanS.0 software. RESULTS: 14 literatures were included, invovling 967 patients. Mortality[OR=0.41,95%CI(0.26,0.65),P〈0.01], effective rate[OR=2.52,95%CI(1.40,4.54) ,P〈0.01], APACHE score[OR=-3.70,95%CI(-6.13,-1.28),P〈0.01] and TCM score [MD=-2.03,95%CI(-3.00,-1.06),P〈0.01] of integrated Chinese and western medicine group were better than those of control group. CONCLUSION: The integrated Chinese and western medicine scheme is effective in the treatment of sepsis. High-quality large-scale multiple-centered RCTs are required and results of systematic evaluation should be considered carefully, because included studies is limited.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117