检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王富兰[1] 唐良萏[1] 王丽[1] 龚瑶[1] 王晓燕[1] 周小利[1] 陈锦云[2] 刘晓华[2] 谢莉玲[3]
机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学附属第一医院妇产科,重庆400016 [2]重庆医科大学附属第一医院海扶中心,重庆400016 [3]重庆医科大学附属第一医院第一分院,重庆400016
出 处:《激光杂志》2013年第2期70-71,共2页Laser Journal
摘 要:目的:探讨超声消融术与子宫肌瘤剔除术对子宫肌瘤患者生存质量影响的差异。方法:随机选择100例子宫肌瘤患者按手术方式分组,分为超声消融组50例和子宫肌瘤剔除组50例。采用SF-36量表调查各组在术前1个月、术后1个月和术后12个月的生存质量。结果:术后1个月生存质量显示,超声消融组生存质量高于子宫肌瘤剔除组,p<0.05;术后12个月时两组生存质量差异无统计学意义,p>0.05。结论:超声消融术治疗子宫肌瘤能快速恢复患者的生存质量,但患者对超声消融术的心理接受程度还有待提高。Objective:To investigate the difference of high- intensity focused ultrasound and myomectomy on the quality of life in patients with uterine hysteromyomas. Methods: 100 women with uterine hysteromyonlas were selected and randomly divided into high- intensity focused ultrasound group(n = 50) and myomectomy group( n = 50 ). 36 - item Short Form Health Survery( SF - 36) was used to assess the quality of life of patients in the two groups when the patients were followed up at 1 months before therapy, months and 12 months after surgery. Results: Quality of life in high- intensity focused ultrasound group was significantly higher than the patients in myomectomy group 1 month after operation, p 〈 0.05;there were no significant differences between the two groups, p 〉 0.05. Conclusion:High- intensity focused ultrasound for uterine hysteromyomas can resume quality of life in a short time, but the acceptance of high- intensity focused ultrasound should be reinforced.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3