检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾会学[1] 李玲[1] 任军红[1] 贾建侠[1] 赵艳春[1] 赵秀莉[1] 姚希[1] 李六亿[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学第一医院感染管理-疾病预防控制处,北京100034
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2013年第7期1648-1650,共3页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
摘 要:目的了解医务人员手卫生正确率及干预措施的效果。方法在医务人员不知情的情况下,由受过专门培训的调查员,按照统一的方法和表格,调查医务人员手卫生正确率;采取签署目标责任书、会议反馈等干预措施。结果医务人员手卫生的正确率为85.04%,不同专业医务人员手卫生正确率相差较大,以护士最高,为94.09%;随着一系列干预措施的实施与推进,医务人员手卫生正确率由70.78%升高至92.88%,呈逐月升高趋势,差异有统计学意义(χ2=128.56,P<0.05)。结论信息传递通畅并及时反馈对提高医务人员手卫生正确率至关重要;在培训方面应关注手卫生揉搓时间的宣传,并针对不同个体、不同问题细化培训。OBJECTIVE To investigate the accuracy of hand hygiene of the medical staff and the effectiveness of bundle interventions. METHODS We observed and recorded the hand hygiene practices of the workers using single-blind method and carried out bundle interventions, such as signing target responsibility documents, meeting feedback, and so on. All the investigators who were specially trained conducted the investigation according to uniform method and investigation form. RESULTS The accuracy of hand hygiene of the healthcare workers was 85. 04%, which varied among different professional workers. The accuracy of hand hygiene of the nurses was 94.09%, which was the highest. With the implementation of bundle interventions, the accuracy of hand hygiene of the healthcare workers increased from 70.78G to 92.88% , showing an monthly upward trend, the difference was statistically significant(x^2= 128.56,P〈0.05 ). CONCLUSION The smooth delivery of information and the timely feedback are crucial to improve the accuracy of hand hygiene of the medical staffs. On the training, we should be aware of the publicity of information about the duration of hand rubbing and develop the refinement of training for different individuals and different issues.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28