检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江财经学院法学院,浙江杭州310019 [2]住房和城乡建设部城乡规划管理中心,北京100835
出 处:《城市发展研究》2013年第3期119-125,共7页Urban Development Studies
摘 要:我国政府对地下管线管理日益重视,各地的地方管线立法在最近几年也密集出台、生效。但地下管线事故仍然频发,其实际效果有待检验。由于台湾地区与大陆同根同源,社会背景、法律传统及政府架构与大陆较为类似,因此相关的制度设计和法律规范的借鉴极有可能。对比我国台湾地区对地下管线管理的法规范体系,发现其协调性机制完备、资料库建制日趋成熟,整体的管线立法覆盖全面、重点突出、注重细节,颇值得借鉴。Chinese government nowadays is putting emphasis on underground pipeline management increasingly. More and more local legislation on underground pipeline is coming into force in recent years while underground pipeline accidents still occurred frequently, thus the actual results are to be tested. Since China's Mainland and Taiwan region have the same origin, similar social background, legal tradition and the government structure of both region are similar, the design of institution and norms on underground pipeline in China's Mainland shall draw on the experience of the latter. In contrast, underground pipeline management legal system in Taiwan involves coordination rnechanism, well-functioned database system, and a comprehensive as well as detailed pipeline management system which is worth drawing on.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.149.194