检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学管理学院,武汉430074 [2]规划研究院物流组织与政策研究室,浙江宁波315042
出 处:《控制与决策》2013年第4期517-524,共8页Control and Decision
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71072034)
摘 要:研究由单批发商多零售商构成的供应商管理库存(VMI)供应链,批发商向外部供应商订货,并为价格和缺货成本不同的零售商补货.首先构造解析模型以分析如何为多类零售商确定不同的库存分配策略;然后将这一最优的库存分配策略与最优的先到先服务(FCFS)策略进行比较,同时比较相应简化的库存分配策略和简化的FCFS策略.解析和算例结果表明,简化的库存分配策略总是优于简化的FCFS策略,而最优的库存分配策略大部分情况下优于最优的FCFS策略.This paper considers a vendor-managed inventory(VMI) system with one wholesaler and multiple retailers. The wholesaler replenishes its inventory from an outside supplier, and ships them to different retailers who are distinguished by their contractual prices and backorder costs. An analytical model is proposed to coordinate the inventory and shipment decisions, and ration inventory among various retailers. Firstly, the optimal rationing policy is compared with the optimal first-come first serviced(FCFS) policy. Then the reduced rationing policy is compared with the reduced FCFS policy. The results show that the performance under the reduced rationing policy is always better than that of reduced FCFS policy, while the optimal rationing policy is superior to the optimal FCFS policy most of the time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222