检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东中医药大学附属医院,山东济南250011
出 处:《中国肛肠病杂志》2013年第2期39-41,共3页Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
摘 要:为观察多模式镇痛在肛门病手术中的应用价值,将2011年2月至2012年8月拟于连续硬膜外一蛛网膜下腔联合麻醉下手术治疗的250例肛肠疾病患者随机分为A~E5组,每组50例。A组为对照组,术毕不进行任何镇痛处理;B组术毕于肛周3、6、9点注射亚甲蓝混合液;C组术前静脉滴注特耐40mg^D组术前静脉滴注特耐40rag,术毕进行舒芬太尼自控静脉镇痛(PCIA);E组术前静脉滴注特耐40rag,术毕进行耐乐品自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)。对比观察5组患者术后6h、12h、24h、48h及首次换药时的疼痛程度及不良反应。结果显示,A组各时刻VAS评分均明显高于其他4组,B、c组各时刻VAS评分明显高于D、E组,P〈O.05;B、C组问各时刻VAS评分差异均无统计学意义,P〉O.05;D、E组间术后6h、12h、24h、48hVAS评分差异无统计学意义,P〉O.05,但术后首次换药时D组VAS评分明显高于E组,P〈O.05。B组有3例出现局部灼痛感;D组有2例出现恶心,1例出现呕吐;其余各组无不良反应。结果表明,肛肠病患者围手术期多模式镇痛的效果明显优于其他单一镇痛模式,并且特耐复合耐乐品PCEA对患者术后运动痛更具有优势。This study was to evaluate the applicable value of intraoperative multi-modal analgesia for the patients with anal diseases. The 250 patients to be subjected to surgery under associated epidural and sub- arachnoid cavity anesthesia(2011-02 to 2012-08) were randomly divided into five groups: A,B,C,D, E,50 cases for each;group A was control one which did not receive any analgesia management;group B received methylene blue mixed injection at 3,6,9 points of perianus after operation; group C was intravenously in- stilled with Tenai (parecoxih sodium) 40rag be{ore operation; group D was intravenously instilled with Tenai 40 mg before operation,afterward received patient-control intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with sufen- tanil when operation ended;group E was intravenously injected with Tenai 40rag, secondaryly, received pa- tient-control epidural analgesia (PCEA) with Nailepin(ropiracaine). The pain degree and adverse reactions of above 5 group's patients at 6,12,24 and 48h after operation as well as the first dressing change were ob- served and compared. As results,at all time-points VAS rating of group A was all significantly higher than that of rest 4 groups,and,group t3 and C significantly higher than group D and E( P d0.05);but,between B and C there was no statistical differences( P 〉0.05) ;between D and E at 6,12,24 and 48h after opera- tion there also was no statistical differences( P 〉0.05),while at the first dressing change VAS rating of group D significantly higher than group E( P 〈0.05) ;Except that 3 cases of group B suffered from local thermalgia,2 cases had nausea and 1 case vomiting in group D, there was no adverse reactions in rest groups. Results show that multi modal analgesia is superior to other any mono-modal one, and compound Tenai and Nailepin in PCEA has better efficacy on postoperative motion pain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80