检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯志仙[1] 王飞霞[1] 章梅云[1] 童晓飞[1] 章海滨[1] 钟紫凤[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院附属第一医院,浙江杭州310003
出 处:《护理与康复》2013年第3期211-213,共3页Journal of Nursing and Rehabilitation
基 金:浙江省卫生厅基金资助项目;编号:2011KYB034
摘 要:目的观察快速康复外科理念下手术后患者在社区随访的效果。方法将658例手术后患者按其意愿分为观察组328例、对照组330例,观察组患者出院后在社区医疗机构随访,对照组患者出院后在手术医院随访,比较两组患者生命质量和随访所需时间、费用、术后并发症发生情况。结果两组患者生命质量、术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义,观察组随访所需时间及费用明显少于对照组。结论快速康复外科理念下出院的患者由社区医疗机构完成随访,可发挥社区医疗机构的基本医疗功能和作用,提高现有卫生资源的有效利用率。Objective To observe the effect of community follow--up for post--operation patients based on concept of fast--track surgery. Method Divide 658 patients into observation group (n^328) and control group (n^330) according to their intention. Patients in observation group receive follow--up in community medical institutions after discharge. Patients in control group receive follow--up in their operation hospital. Compare the quality of life, follow--up time, cost and post --operation complication for patients in two groups. Result There is no significant difference on quality of life and post-- operation complication between two groups. Follow--up time and cost are needed less in observation group. Conclusion Community follow--up for post--operation patients based on concept of fast--track surgery can enhance the function of bas- ic medical care for community medical institutions and improve the effective utilization of nresent health resources.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.214