检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:费宏达[1]
机构地区:[1]东北财经大学津桥商学院,辽宁大连116622
出 处:《沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第2期183-186,共4页Journal of Shenyang University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:辽宁省教育厅基金资助项目(W2010141)
摘 要:《侵权责任法》第87条对侵权人不明的高楼落物侵权责任的承担进行了规定,具有保障受害人得到补偿、统一司法实践、降低致害概率的积极意义。但是,该规定也存在许多不足之处,主要表现为不利于社会和谐、容易引发道德风险、预防功能不充分、适用前提不明确等,没有很好地解决高楼落物侵权所面临的困境。采取社会救济、高楼落物赔偿基金、保险赔偿等多种途径相结合的救济方式,行政法、刑法与《侵权责任法》相配合的惩罚制度,不仅可以使受害人得到及时的、充分的补偿,而且可以有效预防此类侵权损害的发生。The tort liability of falling object from tall building without specific tortfeasor is specified in article 87 of the Tort Liability Law,which has active significance of ensuring the compensation for victims,unifying the judicial practices,and reducing the probability of injury.But the Article still has some shortcomings in that it goes against social harmony,easily triggers moral risk,is insufficient of prevention function,and is ambiguous of application precondition,etc.It has not best solved the dilemma of tort liability of falling object from tall building.It can not only provide timely and sufficient compensation for the victim,but also effectively prevent this kind of tort by adopting the remedy method combining multiple approaches of social remedy,compensation fund of falling object from tall building,and insurance compensation,and by adopting the punishment institution coordinating administrative law,criminal law and Tort Liability Law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49