检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《医学美学美容(中旬刊)》2013年第3期1-1,3,共2页
摘 要:目的了解不同的拍背排痰在婴幼儿毛细支气管炎中的作用,提高排痰效果,提高家属依从性,尽可能减少并发症的发生,缩短患儿住院时间。方法将2011年12月至2012年12月收治的毛细支气管炎患儿120例按入院当天先后次序依次分为观察组和对照组,对照组行传统的拍背排痰方法,观察组行改良式拍背排痰法,比较两组患儿的治疗效果、住院时间及家属的依从性。结果观察组治疗总有效率95.5%,优于对照组86.2%,但差异无显著性〈P〉0.05);患儿临床症状开始缓解时间较对照组明显缩短(P〈0.05);住院时间明显减少(P〈0.05);家属的依从性明显增强(P〈0.05)。结论改良式拍背排痰法此传统拍背排痰法更有利于婴幼儿毛细支气管炎患儿的恢复,缩短患儿住院时间。增强家属的依从性。Objective To identify the expectoration effect by modified method of backslap to the children patients with bronchiolitis. Methods Divided all the patients into study group and control group.Modified method of backslap used in study group and traditional backslap in control group.The effect, length of stay and the compliance of family members in two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate in study group was better than that in control group but no significant differences (P〉0.05). The relieving time of clinical symptoms and length of stay in study group were shorter than in control group (P〈0. 05). The compliance of family members was better in study group than in control group (P〈0.05).Conelusion The modified method of backslap to the children patients with bronchiolitis was better than the traditional method of backslap in their effect, length of stay and compliance.
分 类 号:R322.34[医药卫生—人体解剖和组织胚胎学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117