加权TOPSIS法与加权秩和比法在湖南省农村药品监督与供应网络建设评价中的应用  

Weighted TOPSIS method and weighted RSR method in the construction of drug supervision and supply networks in rural areas of Hunan

作　　者：沈敏学[1] 曾娜[1] 胡婧璇[1] 吴公平 许林勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系,长沙410078 [2]湖南省食品药品监督管理局药品市场监管处,长沙410013

出　　处：《中南大学学报（医学版）》2013年第3期301-306,共6页Journal of Central South University ：Medical Science

基　　金：湖南省自然科学基金(08JJ3072)~~

摘　　要：目的:评价加权TOPSIS法和加权秩和比法在湖南省农村药品监督与供应网络的建设综合评价中的科学性与有效性。方法:以2010年湖南农村药品监督与供应网络建设情况的数据为资料,构建综合评价模型,应用加权TOPSIS法和秩和比法对其进行实证研究,并与综合评分法的排序结果对比。结果:构建了3个一级指标、8个二级指标、56个三级指标的综合评价模型,加权秩和比法与综合评分法的排序结果高度相关,加权TOPSIS法与另2种方法相关性稍低,但均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:两种评价方法各有优缺点,但在本研究中均具有合理性、有效性和科学性。Objective： To evaluate the rationality and validity of weighted TOPSIS method and weighted RSR method to evaluate drug supervision and supply networks construction in rural areas of Hunan. Methods- Data of drug network construction in rural Hunan in 2010 were used to establish a comprehensive evaluation model, and weighted TOPSIS and RSR method were applied to this model and the results of which were compared to that of synthetical scored method to examine the validity.Results： A comprehensive evaluation model was established, comprising of 3 primary indices, 8 secondary indices and 56 tertiary ones. The result of weighted RSR method was highly correlated to that of synthetical scored method, yet the result of TOPSIS was less correlated to the formers. All correlations were significant （P〈0.0 1）. Conclusion： Both weighted RSR and TOPSIS are not perfect methods, but the application of the methods in drug network evaluation is scientific and effective.

关 键 词：综合评价模型 综合评分法 加权TOPSIS法 加权秩和比法 药品监督与供应网 

分 类 号：R181.3[医药卫生—流行病学]