腰椎间盘突出症保守治疗与介入治疗疗效回顾性对比分析  

Retrospective Comparison of Lumbar Disc Herniation Treated with Conservative Treatment and Interventional Therapy

作　　者：周友龙[1] 赵树华[2] 党长林[2] 陈晓燕[2] 王权亮[2] 杨勇[1] 刘宜军[1] 苏成果[2] 段艳利[2] 

机构地区：[1]河南中医学院第三附属医院,郑州450008 [2]河南中医学院针灸推拿学院

出　　处：《中国中医骨伤科杂志》2013年第4期15-17,共3页Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics

摘　　要：目的:观察腰椎间盘突出症保守治疗与介入治疗的疗效。方法:电话随机回访145例已接受保守治疗和170例已接受介入治疗的腰椎间盘突出症患者,获取相关资料,经统计学分析,观察腰椎间盘突出症保守治疗与介入治疗的疗效。结果:保守与介入治疗在疗效、病程、突出节段等比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);但在治疗后时间有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:保守治疗和介入治疗均为治疗腰椎间盘突出的有效方法。保守治疗近期效果好,介入治疗远期效果要优于保守治疗。Objective：To observe the curative effect of conservative treatment and interventional therapy to treat lumbar disc herniation （LDH）. Methods： All 145 patients of LDH which were accepted with conservative treatment and 170 patients with interventional therapy were randomly followed up through telephone to collect relevant information. The curative effect was compared by statistical analysis. Results： The curative effect, course of disease, and extrusion segment was not different between the two groups （P^0.05）, but the time after treatment was different （P^O. 05）. Conclusion：Both con- servative treatment and interventional therapy are effective for LDH. Conservative treatment is more effective in short- term, and interventional therapy is better efficacy in long-term.

关 键 词：腰椎间盘突出 保守 介入 疗效 

分 类 号：R681.53[医药卫生—骨科学]