检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]焦作工学院资源与材料工程系,河南焦作454000
出 处:《焦作工学院学报》2000年第3期169-171,共3页Journal of Jiaozuo Institute of Technology(Natural Science)
摘 要:通过在“新型多功能矿井通风安全实验装置”上所进行的对比试验 ,分析了在工业通风及空调工程的风道中 ,采用多点联合测试速压比多测点测试的误差偏大的原因 ,且误差的大小 ,受风道测试断面速压分布的相对不均匀度影响 ,相对不均匀度值愈大 ,误差亦愈大 .因而 ,在工程测试时 ,用皮托管———压差计测试风道内的平均速压 ,应选择多测点逐点测试计算法 .By the comparative tests performed on the new_type multi_function mine ventilation safety testing equipment;it has analyzed the causes that more error made by way of multi_point combination determinating speed pressure than the way of multi_point in industrial ventilation and in the project of the air control in wind channel,it is considered that more or less error are effected by the relative non_uniform of the speed pressure distribution on the section which should be determined in the wind channel.It has stated that the larger the relative non_uniform degree the more error it is.Therefore,it should choose UNIPED test of the multi_point and the point by point method to calculating the average speed pressure by Pitometer?——differetial pressure flowmeter when the project is being tested.
分 类 号:TD723[矿业工程—矿井通风与安全]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222