后保管时代基础理论研究之三——新来源观解析  

作　　者：何嘉荪[1] 楼淑君[2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学 [2]浙江经济职业技术学院

出　　处：《浙江档案》2013年第3期9-14,共6页Zhejiang Archives

摘　　要：后保管模式发端于20世纪80年代对来源原则的"重新发现"。这种发现奠基于20世纪以来来源概念的持续演进,它非传统概念的再现,而是定格在"形成文件的业务活动"上。特里库克等学者更以后现代主义哲学为武器,将其提升为"概念来源"或"后现代来源"。以其与我国学者提出的"广义来源观"进行比较研究,可以发现:尽管两者理论基础不同却殊途同归,本质上完全相同;不同点则在于"后现代来源观"的描述,更加强调其虚拟性、动态性和复杂性;"广义来源观"的描述则比较简洁,更注意其实用性,然而这也进一步导致了两者间其他的一些歧异。＂Post-custody Mode＂ originated from the ＂rediscovery＂ for the Principle of Provenance in the 1980＇s, which was based on constant evolution of Provenance concept since 20th century. This rediscovery was not representation of traditional concept, yet put a frame on ＂the business transactions ＂where the records are produced. Some scholars, such as Terry Cook, promoted it to ＂Conceptual Provenance＂ or ＂Postmodern Provenance＂, based on the postmodernism philosophy. If a comparison happened between ＂Postmodern Provenance＂ and ＂Generalized Provenance Concept＂（which was created by us, Chinese scholars in 1988）, we could find that the exactly same in nature existed in both concepts although they have different theory base; And we can also find that the difference is on description ways： the former emphasized on virtual, dynamics, complexity, but the latter laid stress on materiality, practicality. It is the different description ways led to further diverge in other aspect between two concepts.

关 键 词：后保管模式 后现代来源观 概念来源 广义来源观 来源原则的重新发现 后保管时代 

分 类 号：G270[文化科学—档案学]