检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王金彩[1] 杨道坤[1] 郑继海[1] 刘小红[1]
出 处:《中国现代药物应用》2013年第5期11-12,共2页Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
基 金:2011年度河南省医学科技攻关计划普通项目(项目编号:2011020093)
摘 要:目的观察替比夫定与拉米夫定治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法将124例慢性乙型肝炎患者随机分为替比夫定组(TBV)62例,拉米夫定组(LVD)23例,疗程均为48周。观察两组治疗12,24,48周时的HBV-DNA阴转率、HbeAg阴转率和ALT复常率及药物的不良反应。结果在治疗12,24和48周时TBV组的HBV-DNA阴转率均显著优于LVD组(P<0.01),HBeAg阴转率和ALT复常率两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组均未发现明显不良反应。结论替比夫定治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎疗效优于拉米夫定,是抗乙肝病毒治疗的较佳选择。Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Telbivudine (TBV) and Lamivudine (LVD) for patients with HBeAg positive chronic Hepatitis B (CHB). Methods 124 patients were divided in- to Group Telbivudine(TBV)(62 patients) and Lamivudine (LVD) (64 patients) randomly and were received TBV and LVD for 48 weeks, respectively. HBV-DNA negative-conversion rate, HBeAg negative-conversion rate, Serum ALT normalization rate and adverse reactions of the two agents were monitored at weeks 12, 24 and 48 weeks. Results In the HBV-DNA negative-conversion rate at weeks 12, 24 and 48 weeks, Group TBV is superior to group LAV (P 〈 0.01 ) and there were no significant differences in HBeAg negative-conversion rate and Serum ALT normalization rate between two groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). No serious adverse reaction were found in both groups. Conclusion Telbivudine is more effective in inhibiting reproduction of HBV than that of Lamivu- dine and could be used for long-term treatment of the patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.254