检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南车株洲电力机车研究所有限公司 [2]中南大学能源科学与工程学院 [3]株洲市住房和城乡建设局
出 处:《建筑热能通风空调》2013年第1期95-99,共5页Building Energy & Environment
摘 要:针对兆瓦级风电机组机舱的通风散热问题,提出了下送上排、下送下排、侧送上排以及侧送下排四种不同的气流组织形式,利用CFD软件对这四种气流组织形式下机舱内的温度场进行了数值模拟,并将模拟结果进行了对比。数值模拟过程假设机舱罩为绝热边界,并利用第二类热边界条件来描述机舱内热源。此外还借助realizable k-ε湍流模型并采用SIMPLE算法。模拟结果表明:相对下送式的两种气流组织形式,侧送式有着更合理的温度分布。尤其是侧送上排式,在三个特定切面上的温度分布均优于其它三种气流组织形式。Four kinds of air regulation methods were introduced, which were bottom to top method, bottom to bottom method, side to top method and side to bottom method, to solve the ventilation and heat dissipation problem. Numerical simulation was conducted to obtain the temperature filed of each method, and the results of the simulation were analyzed and compared. During the simulation, the nacelle was thought to be an adiabatic boundary and the second thermal boundary condition was introduced to model the heat source inside the nacelle. Finally the realizable k-e model and SIMPLE algorithm were employed. The results of the numerical simulation showed that the side-in methods exhibited better performance compared to the bottom-in methods, especially the side to top method whose temperature field in the 3 chips was proven to be much better.
关 键 词:气流组织数值模拟温度场风电机组
分 类 号:TU831[建筑科学—供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145