检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南省新县人民医院妇产科,465550 [2]河南省人民医院妇产科
出 处:《中国实用医药》2013年第6期36-37,共2页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的比较中重度宫腔粘连患者术后三种预防粘连方法的疗效。方法 80例中重度宫腔粘连患者进行宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离,术后分别采用A组,宫腔镜检查组,B组,节育环组,C组,球囊组分别于术后1个月、3个月复查宫腔粘连情况,并记录月经改善及受孕情况。结果三种方法术后预防再粘连的效果都很显著,差异无统计学意义。术后放置5d球囊管后,放置宫内节育环,不增加感染率。结论相对经济,效果肯定,患者依从性好,受孕率高,可作为宫腔粘连分离防止再粘连的常规用法。Objective To compare the effects of three methods for prevention of re-adhension after hysteroscopic separation.Methods 80 patients of intrauterine adhension after hysteroscopic separation were randly assigned to group A,hysteroscopic checking;group B,IUD group;group C,Balloon catheter placing group.After 1 month,3 months follow-up,detailed menstruation improvement and preganancy condition after operaration were recorded.Results There were no significant difference among three groups,All of them were effective.After giving 5 day's Balloon catheter,replacing IUD,didn't increase infection and improving pregnancy.Conclusion It can be used as conventional method for prevention of re-adhension.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40