检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓石凤[1] 周雯莉[2] 肖姗 唐蔚[2] 李丽娟[4] 李玲[1] 万丽红[4]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院神经内科,广东广州510080 [2]广州大学,广东广州510006 [3]广州市越秀区第三人民医院慢病科,广东广州510110 [4]中山大学护理学院,广东广州510089
出 处:《现代临床护理》2013年第1期1-6,共6页Modern Clinical Nursing
基 金:广东省医学科研基金立项课题;项目编号为A2011158;广东省科技厅社会发展计划项目;项目编号为2005B33801005
摘 要:目的描述广州市社区高血压患者的脑卒中预防知识现状并探讨其影响因素。方法采用脑卒中预防知识问卷对在广州市某社区卫生服务中心就诊的94例原发性高血压患者进行调查。结果患者的脑卒中预防知识总分为(62.70±18.39)分,多元逐步回归分析显示,文化程度较高者、女性患者的脑卒中预防知识水平较高;得分最低的项目是血压监测(43.09±25.77)分,患者在服药、运动及生活起居方面均存在认识误区。结论广州市社区高血压患者的脑卒中预防知识不容乐观,应引起社区医护人员的高度重视。脑卒中一级预防健康教育应重点关注小学文化程度及男性高血压患者,并应关注患者在脑卒中预防中的认识误区。Objective To investigate the current situations in stroke-prevention knowledge and influential factors in hypertensive patients from the communities of Guangzhou. Methods 94 hypertensive patients visiting the community health service centers in Guangzhou participated in the survey using stroke-preventing knowledge questionnaire. Results The total score on the stroke-preventing knowledge was (62.70 ± 18.39). By stepwise regression analysis, those female and well-educated scored higher. The score on monitoring the blood pressure was the lowest (43.09 ±25.77). There were mistakes in medication, physical exercises and living habits. Conclusions The hypertensive patients in the communities in Guangzhou lack of stroke-preventing knowledge. In the stroke-preventing education, those male patients as well as those with less education deserves more attention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.12