检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:廖文芳[1]
机构地区:[1]广西师范大学历史文化与旅游学院,广西桂林541001
出 处:《自然科学史研究》2012年第4期428-434,共7页Studies in The History of Natural Sciences
摘 要:木兰作为一种非常名贵的建筑材料和珍贵药材在唐代以前常被提及,之后史籍记载渐少,并常常与其他植物混淆。现代人多认为是今木兰科植物,但历史文献对木兰的记载与今木兰科植物的生物学、药用等各种特性出入较大。通过对木兰的文献记载进行分析,讨论了将木兰原植物弄错的原因,并根据木兰的各种形态学及生态学特征,考证其为今樟科樟属植物阴香。As a precious building material and medicinal plant, "Mulan" was often mentioned in books before Tang Dynatsy. After then, literature about "Mulan" became less and was confused with other plants. Today, "Mulan" was considered as a species of Magnoliaceae. However, the bio- logical characteristics and medical value of "Mulan" described in ancient literature is materially dif- ferent from those plants in Magnoliaceae considered as "Mulan". Based on the literature analysis of "Mulan" in ancient books, the reason of misinformation about "Mulan" is discussed. Based on the morphological and ecological characteristics, "Mulan" was verified as Cinnamomum burmannii B1. , a species of Cinnamomum Trew in Lauraceae.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7