戴震《方言疏证》校改内容疏议  

Commentary on the corrections to the content in Annotations on Topolects(Fang yan shu zheng)

作　　者：徐玲英[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学,合肥230039

出　　处：《大学图书情报学刊》2012年第5期90-93,共4页Journal of Academic Library and Information Science

摘　　要：戴震凭借自己深厚的小学功底和广博的文献基础,或遵善本,或据他书援引,综合条贯,以理断定,为《方言》正讹补脱,使这本名存而实亡的语言学著作神明焕然。文章略举数例,以见戴震校勘之精审,示其足以为后世校勘楷模的原因所在。然校勘之事,本非一人之精力所能尽,《方言疏证》中也存在一些校改之误,文章对此试做疏议。With his good grounding in philological literature and the extensive and profound knowledge of documentation, Dai Zhen corrected the errors and made up for deficiencies of Topolets either by complying with the original of rare books, or by citing from works by famous scholars to form the whole by bringing together the separate parts and attributing to the analyzed descriptions and explanations. It was he who made the book of linguistics, which had already ceased to exist except in name brilliant splendor. This article makes a brief list to reveal his cautions and carefulness in collation, and presents the reasons that why he has been regarded as a brilliant example for the scholars of later generations to follow in collating ancient books. No matter how capable he was, it is impossible for him to make the work of collation perfect. Some errors still exist in Annotations on Topolects, and the author of this article venturt~ ra m^t-,= th L___

关 键 词：戴震 《方言疏证》 校对 疏议 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]