悠然之境:陶渊明隐逸与海德格尔诗意的栖居比较  

On the Conditions of Carefree Leisure:A Comparative Study of TAO Yuan-ming's Seclusion and Heiddegger's Poetic Dwelling

作　　者：高有[1] 高雅[2] 

机构地区：[1]集宁师范学院中文系,内蒙古乌兰察布012000 [2]集宁师范学院附属中学,内蒙古乌兰察布012000

出　　处：《集宁师范学院学报》2012年第3期22-27,共6页Journal of Jining Normal University

基　　金：内蒙古自治区高等学校科学研究项目:"唐宋桃源文学与文人心理研究"(项目编号:NJ10220)

摘　　要：隐逸与栖居所代表的是两种不同的文化背景下相似的生存状态,陶渊明与海德格尔虽相隔千年,但他们寻求本真之境的人生追求却使二人有了某种契合:诗化人生是他们共同追求的此在目标;本真的性情与道家文化的渗入,使他们的这种追求有了共同的心理基础;诗思与劳绩是他们共同择取的栖居生发的方式。身世经历的差异,又使他们对神的态度有所不同:渊明漠视神,而海德格尔对神更多的是虔诚与信奉。对隐逸与栖居的比较研究,不仅为陶潜研究拓展了视野,而且对现代人生的追求也有重要的启迪意义。Living as a hermit and poetic existence are two kinds of similar surviving conditions against the two different cultural backgrounds.A thousand years apart in time though TAO Yuan-ming and Martin Heidegger lived,yet in terms of seeking for the truth of poetic dwelling they corresponded to each other in the following aspects-their common pursuit of existence to live a poetic life,the infiltration of Taoism into their separate natural dispositions as their similar psychological foundation of their common pursuit,their similar choices of poetic meditations and at last great achievements through hard work as their developing modes of existence.The discrepancies of their life experience shaped their different attitudes towards gods—TAO Yuan-ming＇s ignorance of gods and Heidegger＇s religious piety and belief.Hence it is thought in this paper that the comparative study of TAO Yuan-ming＇s life as a hermit and Heidegger＇s poetic dwelling expands the view of relative research and also provides some significant enlightenment for modern life.

关 键 词：陶渊明 海德格尔 隐逸 诗意栖居 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]