检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈邦达[1]
机构地区:[1]四川大学,四川成都610064
出 处:《四川警察学院学报》2012年第6期10-17,共8页Journal of Sichuan Police College
基 金:国家社科基金项目<社会转型期司法鉴定不信任问题研究>项目编号:10CFX041;中国行为法学会课题;项目编号:(2010)学研029
摘 要:2012年新刑事诉讼法将技术侦查纳入立法,并对其适用范围、审批程序、证据效力作相对明确的规定,此项举措在兼顾打击犯罪与保障人权双重价值取向等方面都有一定进步,中央司法改革精神、当代国际刑事司法准则、打击犯罪的新形势等诸多因素共同催生了此项变革。新刑诉法在对技术侦查的内涵、形式规制上仍存在模糊、适用范围也留有开口,令状主义尚存在局限,权利救济程序阙如,实为造成条款备受争议的微瑕之处。在今后制定司法解释时,应当对技术侦查措施的内涵和形式进一步明确,对其适用范围的弹性条款进一步限制,加强对技术侦查措施启动的批准控制,逐步完善权利救济程序。The new Criminal Procedure Law covers the limits, writ and evidence rules in technological investigations. It shows the progress in protecting human rights and cracking down criminal activities. The judicial reform guideline from the central government, the international criminal justice principals and the new situation of attacking criminal activities were the comprehensive factors leading to these amendments. However, the connotation and category was ambiguous, the scope was equivocal, the approval proceeding was still debatable and the remedies was not stipulated. In the future we should take these problems into consideration, and balance protecting the human rights and attacking criminal activities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.177.173