检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡志风[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学,北京100875
出 处:《法学杂志》2013年第4期121-128,共8页Law Science Magazine
基 金:中国博士后科学基金资助项目阶段性研究成果~~
摘 要:诉讼文书的规范化,一直是司法理论和实务领域研究的薄弱环节,鲜有论述。诉讼文书制作不规范行为的普遍存在,已经威胁到法律的公正性与权威性,并进一步影响到诉讼价值的实现。基于实证调查的角度来分析审判实践中诉讼文书制作的不规范行为及其处置方式,并对其存在原因从本质上进行深刻反思,提出诉讼文书制作不规范行为的程序性处置方式,以期对司法实践中有效规避不规范的诉讼文书制作行为有所裨益。The problem of standardization of litigation documents is a weak point in the field of judicial theoretical and practical research. And few researches were made about this question. It is prevalence that litigation documents are not standardized in the produced process, which has threaten the realization of the fairness and authority of the law, and even the value of litigation. This article made an analysis of standardization of litigation documents in the perspective of trial practice based on the empirical research. The reasons why non -standard behavior could happen during the madding process of litigation documents are investigated and made clearly through the empirical research. The procedure disposal methods are put forward to avoid non -standard litigation documents effectively based on the empirical research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.19