检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘树广[1]
出 处:《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2000年第4期29-34,共6页Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
摘 要:文献学历来有“古典”与“现代”之分。专家群体的划疆而治和学科归属的游移不定 ,不利于文献学学科的健全和发展。本文分析了古典文献学与现代文献学的相异和相通之处 ,论证了两者交融的必要性和可行性 ,并对构建“大文献学”There has all along existed a distinction between the classical documentation and the modern documentation. These two subfields draw a clear demarcation line in between and each acts in its own way. And further more,the affiliation of the documentation keeps on vacillating. All this is detrimental to the integral development of the documentation science. In this article the author makes an analysis of the diversity and the interconnections between classical documentation and modern documentation,expounds the necessity and the feasibility of the integration of the two subfields,and brings forth his tentative ideas about the establishment of the macro documentation system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.5.237