检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李挺[1]
出 处:《上海商学院学报》2013年第1期79-82,共4页Business Economic Review
摘 要:产品侵权责任属于严格责任范畴,产品缺陷的证明是承担责任的基本前提。在诉讼中,产品缺陷的证明责任的分配是核心问题,目前我国法律对此并未有明确规定,实践中法院的做法存在差异。应当对商品缺陷采取推定原则,如果要证明产品不存在缺陷,则由产品生产者承担举证责任。Under the doctrine of liability fixation, product liability belongs to strict liability, so defect proof is the premise of assuming the liability. When legal action is taken, who has the onus to provide evidence is quite essential. At present, the Tort Liability Law in China does not clearly stipulate the issue. In legal practice, the courts make decisions at their own discretions. In such cases, the principle of presumption should be applied. To presume that a product is free from defects, the manufacturer of the product has the obligation to provide evidence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49