检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯榆霞[1]
机构地区:[1]宁夏科学技术发展战略和信息研究所,宁夏银川750001
出 处:《生态经济》2013年第5期66-70,共5页Ecological Economy
摘 要:运用DEA-Tobit两步法估算和解释1992~2008年中国区域环境规制与全要素生产率之间关系。实证结果发现:第一,总体来说,中国全要素生产率是上升的,主要依靠技术进步的推动,并且TFP指数存在时序和区域特征。第二,环境规制对全要素生产率增长具有一定积极作用,支持"波特假说"。第三,环境规制对TFP影响系数的时间虚拟变量不显著,但区域特征显著,其表现为:东部地区环境规制较为严格且TFP较高,这可能与工业化所处的阶段、中央与地方政府环境规制博弈、FDI技术外溢效有密切关系。The paper estimates and explains the relationship between environmental regulation and total factor productivity, evidence from the provincial data in China since 1992, based on the two stage of DEA-Tobit model. The findings are: firstly, The total factor productivity has been on the rise since 1992, depending on the promotion of technology progress, and there is time series and regional characteristics in the TFP index during the sample period; Secondly, there is some certain in the relationship between environmental regulation and total factor productivity, supporting the "Porter Hypothesis". Thirdly, there is no significance in the time dummy variables of the effect coefficient, but not in the case for region at all. It reflects the more stringency of environmental regulation the eastern regions employ, the more high scores that of TFP indexes embrace, which maybe correlated with the stage industrialization of the region, the game theory of the federal and local government's environmental policy, and the spillover effect of the technology from FDI.
关 键 词:环境规制 全要素生产率 DEA-TOBIT两步法
分 类 号:F205[经济管理—国民经济] X321[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249