箱板式高桩码头简化计算方法比较  

Comparison of Simplified Calculation Method of the Box-Slab High-Pile Wharf

作　　者：王文仲[1] 何良德[1] 杨洋[2] 张志明[3] 李新国[3] 

机构地区：[1]河海大学港口海岸与近海工程学院,江苏南京210098 [2]江苏科技大学船舶与海洋工程学院,江苏镇江212003 [3]中交水运规划设计院有限公司,北京100007

出　　处：《江南大学学报（自然科学版）》2013年第2期216-220,共5页Joural of Jiangnan University (Natural Science Edition)　

摘　　要：阐述了箱板式高桩码头的结构特点,介绍了经验系数法(英国BS8100-85)、等代框架法、虚拟交叉梁法等方法的使用条件,以及计算方法。以具体工程实例验证了3种计算方法应用在码头结构中的可行性。3种方法计算比较简便,可通过手算或借助简单的计算程序实现,并将3种计算方法的计算结果与有限元数值计算结果进行比较。结果表明,虚拟交叉梁法与有限元数值计算结果最为接近,等代框架法次之,经验系数法相比较为保守。This papere elaborates the structure feature of the box-slab high-pile wharf, and introduces the condition of applications and the calculation methods of direct design method, method of equivalent framework and method of virtual intersection girder. The feasibility of the three methods are tested and verify by the instance of project. The three calculation methods are simple, and can be achieved by hand counted or in virtue of some simplified calculation software. Then compare the results of the three methods with the numerical results of the finite element method. On the basis of the comparison, it is obvious that the result of method of virtual intersection girder is the closest to the finite element numerical analysis, the method of equivalent framework is inferior to the method of virtual intersection girder, and the direct design method is relatively more conservative.

关 键 词：箱板式高桩码头 计算方法 经验系数法 等代框架法 虚拟交叉梁法 

分 类 号：TV314[水利工程—水工结构工程]