检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪燕[1] 谢艳芳[2] 万彦婷[1] 万丽娜[1] 胡建华[1]
机构地区:[1]武警江西总队医院门诊部,江西南昌330001 [2]中国武警总部机关门诊部
出 处:《心血管康复医学杂志》2013年第2期105-108,共4页Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
基 金:Traditional Chinese medicine scientific research fund project of health department of Jian-gxi province(2006A39)~~
摘 要:目的:测定高血压左室肥厚患者血浆肿瘤坏死因子相关的凋亡诱导配体(sTRAIL)、及其死亡受体(sDR4、sDR5)水平。方法:用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)分别检测50例高血压左室肥厚患者(高血压左室肥厚组)、50例高血压无左室肥厚患者(高血压组)和50例健康人(健康对照组)血浆sTRAIL、sDR4和sDR5水平。结果:①与健康对照组及高血压组比较,高血压左室肥厚组血浆sTRAIL[(0.95±0.11)ng/ml比(1.12±0.86)ng/ml比(1.74±1.19)ng/ml]、sDR4[(2.38±0.32)pg/ml比(5.63±1.05)pg/ml比(8.72±1.14)pg/ml]、sDR5[(<6 pg/ml)比(39.19±8.23)pg/ml比(78.21±11.2)pg/ml]水平均明显升高(P<0.01);且高血压组sDR4、sDR5水平明显高于健康对照组(P<0.01),sTRAIL水平与健康对照组无明显差异(P>0.05);②Pear-son相关分析表明,高血压左室肥厚患者sTRAIL、sDR4、sDR5间呈显著的正相关性(r=0.325~0.410,P<0.05或<0.01)。结论:血浆sTRAIL、sDR4、sDR5水平可能是预测高血压患者左室肥厚有价值的指标之一。Objective: To determine plasma levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand (sTRAIL) and its soluble death receptor (sDR4, sDR5) in essential hypertension (EH) patients with left ventricu- lar hypertrophy (LVH). Methods: Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure plasma levels of sTRAIL, sDR4 and sDR5 in 50 EH + LVH patients (EH + LVH group), 50 EH patients without LVH (EH group) and 50 healthy subjects (healthy control group), and the results were compared 'and analyzed among three groups. Results: O Compared with healthy control group and EH group, there were significant increase in plasma levels of sTRAIL [ (0.95±0.11) ng/ml vs. (1.12±0.86) ng/ml vs. (1.74±1.19) ng/ml], sDR4 [ (2.38±0.32) pg/ml vs. (5.63±1.05) pg/ml vs. (8.72±1.14) pg/ml] and sDR5 [ (〈 6 pg/ml) vs. (39.19±8.23) pg/ml vs. (78.21±11.2) pg/ml] in EH + LVH group, P〈0.01 all] and levels of sDR4 and sDR5 in EH group were signifi- cantly higher than those of healthy control group (P 〈 0.01 both), but there was no significant difference in sTRAIL level between the two groups (P〉0.05) ; 2) Pearson correlation analysis indicated that there were signifi- cant positive correlation among levels of sTRAIL, sDR4 and sDR5 in EH + LVH patients (r =0. 325~0. 410, P〈 0. 05 or 〈0. 01). Conclusion: Plasma levels of sTRA/L, sDR4 and sDR5 may be valuable indexes for prediction of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension.
分 类 号:R544.109[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229