检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江西中医学院
出 处:《医学与法学》2013年第2期29-33,共5页Medicine and Jurisprudence
摘 要:公平责任原则是解决民事纠纷的一项重要归责原则,与过错责任原则及无过错责任原则共同建构起了民法的归责体系。我国的医疗纠纷适用过错责任原则,但在司法实践中,时有关于法院适用公平责任原则解决医疗纠纷的报道。公平责任原则是否可以应用到医疗纠纷的解决上存在着诸多争议。本文界定了公平责任原则及其适用范围,认为该原则可以适用于医疗纠纷问题的解决,并探讨了在医疗纠纷中引进公平责任原则的注意事项。Fair liability principle is an important part in solving medical disputes, which constructs the liability system in civil law, together with liability principle of fault, liability principle of no-fault. The liability principle of fault is implemented in Chinese medical disputes, while in judicial practice, fair liability principle is often applied to solve medical disputes by the court. It is always the focus of contention that whether fair liability prin- ciple can be applied in medical disputes. In this paper, the author defines fair liability principle and its application scope, thinks it can be applied to the resolutions of medical disputes, and discusses the precautions in the introduction of fair liability principle to the processing of medical disputes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28