综合康复治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的疗效观察  

Observation of the curative effect of comprehensive rehabilitation treatment for vertebral artery type of cervical spondylosis

作　　者：李镇锋[1,2] 王彩华[1,2] 王丽辉[1,2] 陈郁[1,2] 胡永善[3,4] 

机构地区：[1]上海市浦东医院 [2]复旦大学附属浦东医院康复医学科,上海201399 [3]复旦大学附属华山医院康复医学科 [4]复旦大学上海医学院康复与运动医学系,上海200040

出　　处：《颈腰痛杂志》2013年第2期148-150,共3页The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia

摘　　要：目的探讨综合康复治疗对椎动脉型颈椎病的疗效。将200例椎动脉型颈椎病患者随机分为颈椎牵引组(A组)、颈椎牵引加电疗综合治疗组(B组)每10次一个疗程,治疗20次后,进行比较。方法采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、颈椎病临床评价量表(CASCS)分别对疼痛和颈部功能状态进行评分并进行比较。结果经统计学处理止痛效果和颈部功能改善与治疗前相比两组都有效,B组疗效明显优于A组(P<0.01)。结论颈椎牵引有较好疗效,如果颈椎牵引加上微波和中频电疗综合康复治疗椎动脉型颈椎病则疗效更好。Objective To discuss the effect of comprehensive rehabilitation treatment for vertebral artery type of cervical spondylosis.200 vertebral artery type of cervical spondylosis patients are randomly divided into two groups：group A,the cervical traction group and group B,the group of cervical traction in combination with electrotherapy.A cycle of treatment consists of 10 times.The comparison is implemented after 20 times.Methods The Visual Analogue Scale（VAS） and Clinical Assessment Scale for Cervical Spondylosis（CASCS） are adopted respectively to assess and compare the pains and the cervical functional status.Results After statistical analysis,the result indicates that both groups showed the antalgic effect and cervical functional improvement.However,group B is obviously better than group A,（P0.01）.Conclusion Showing that cervical traction has a good effect,and the effect would be better when used in combination with electrotherapy.

关 键 词：椎动脉型颈椎病 牵引 中频电治疗 微波治疗 

分 类 号：R681.55[医药卫生—骨科学]