检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学卫生管理学院社会医学与卫生事业管理系,安徽合肥230032
出 处:《中华疾病控制杂志》2013年第4期287-290,共4页Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention
基 金:安徽省科技厅国际科技合作项目(06088025)
摘 要:目的对比EQ-5D与SF-12量表对农村糖尿病患者生命质量评估效果,探索生命质量相关影响因素。方法采用EQ-5D与SF-12量表对安徽省农村糖尿病患者生命质量进行评估,使用多元线性回归等统计学方法对比两量表评估结果,分析生命质量影响因素。结果 EQ-5D量表具有较好的可行性与实用性,但敏感性略低于SF-12。SF-12条目与维度较多,在生命质量评价中敏感性更高。年龄、性别、文化程度、糖化血红蛋白测定值、胰岛素使用及医疗保险对糖尿病患者生命质量有不同程度的影响。结论两量表均能在一定程度上较好地反映糖尿病患者的生命质量,其评估结果是可比和互补的。Objective To compare EQ-5D and SF-12 scales in assessment of the effect of the quality of life in pa- tients with diabetes in rural areas, and to explore the related factors of quality of life. Methods EQ-SD and SF-12 scales were selected to assess the quality of life of patients with diabetes in rural areas in Anhui Province. Multiple linear regres- sion and other statistical methods were used to compare the two scales of assessment results and analyze the impact factors of quality of life. Results EQ-SD scale had obvious advantages on the feasibility and practicality, but the sensitivity was slightly lower than the SF-12. SF-12 contained more dimensions, and had higher sensitivity in the evaluation of the quality of life. Age, gender, education level, HbAle, insulin use and medical insurance had varying degrees of impact on the quality of life of diabetic patients. Conclusions The two scales can well reflect the quality of life in patients to some ex- tent, and the assessment results are comparable and complementary.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70