非理性的文与理性的分析法——论罗兰·巴尔特后期文论思想的一个矛盾  

Irrational Text and Rational AnalysisA Contradiction in Roland Barthes＇ Later Literay Theories

作　　者：文玲 

出　　处：《符号与传媒》2013年第1期90-99,共10页Signs & Media

摘　　要：前期罗兰·巴尔特关注符号的科学性、系统性，后期他重新审视了结构主义符号学，称符号学应该攻击西方文明的象征系统和语义系统，以非理性的文解构意义、科学、理性等同体物。然而，巴尔特不自觉地采取了理性的分析法以操作文。我们不无反讽地看到巴尔特不断肯定自己所否定的，一边高呼自己放弃了前期的二元论，一边不停地使用二元论进行分析；一边反对命名，一边不断地进行命名，在自己的理论中，执著地运用前期结构主义方法。In the earlier stage of his career, Roland Barthes followed the scientificalness and systematicness of sign with interest. Later he introspected freshly the stucture-semiology, declaring semiology should attack the symbolic sign and semanticify the systems of Western civilization. Roland Barthes used irrational text to deconstruct and dispel meaning, science and reason, but he used a rational way to analyze the text. In this way, Barthes ironically affirmed what he negated. While he claimed to give up his earlier paradigm, he created continuously more and more paradigm in his analysis. While objecting to naming, he continuously names, unable to part with his early structural methods.

关 键 词：理性 非理性 文 命名 分类 

分 类 号：I565.06[文学—其他各国文学]