检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]合肥市人民检察院,安徽合肥230071
出 处:《学术界》2013年第3期169-177,287,共9页Academics
摘 要:"风险刑法"无论在内涵还是表现形态上都迥异于传统刑法,也对其形成一定的冲击与超越。"风险刑法"在风险治理上的优势决定了其存在的价值,但是"风险刑法"也须以宪政为基础,从宪政维度反思其负面影响是必要的警醒,从宪政视野解读其发展取向是未来的期许。风险刑事立法的谦抑、风险刑事司法的克制、宪法性法益概念的引入和违宪审查制度的确立是"风险刑法"基本发展取向,其将使得"风险刑法"的安全保护机能与人权保障机能之间的张力得到一定的缓解。'The risk criminal law' is different from the traditional criminal law no matter whether in its connotation or its manifestation,and it forms some impact and transcendence toward the traditional criminal law.'The risk criminal law ' depends on its advantage in the governance of risk and should be based on constitutionalism,so it is necessary to analyze its negative impact and futural orientation of development from the constitutionalism vision.Its legislative modesty and judicial restraint,the introduction of the concept of constitutional interests and the establishment of constitutional review become its basic orientation of development;hence,the tension between its function in protecting safety and its function in protecting human rights will be relieved to some extent.
分 类 号:D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D914[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15